EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 2
Executive Summary
Executive compensation is a problem that has recently become a
mainstream topic in the business and political communities. Articles written by experts on sites
such as EPI.org and aspeninstitute.org have sparked nationwide interest in the issue of executive
compensation levels and the widening gap between executive compensation and that of the
average wage earner. Several factors are examined that may or may not contribute to the
problem. First, the typical executive compensation package consists of 10 percent base salary
and 90 percent of various stocks and incentives. However, it is the structure of these incentives
that causes the problem. Short-term incentives and unrestricted stocks can leave a company
vulnerable to unethical or risky practices by executives. An example of this type of behavior is
“rents.” The practice of selling large amounts of stocks when it is advantageous Experts believe
that the rise in executive compensation is much faster than it should. Economic indicators show a
steep rise in CEO pay even during times of moderate gains in the stock market.
This report examines the impact on organizations, communities, and economies affected
by excessive executive compensation. Shareholders, managers, line workers and consumers
suffer when there is an imbalance in a company.
This report lays out a plan to slow the rate of increase of executive compensation using a
combination of ethical practices on all organization levels, legislation designed to reward
companies that work to reduce wage disparity and increased shareholder voting power.
There are issues with this plan. Oversite must be empowered to reprimand offenders and
reward the diligent. However, oversight must be distant. Companies must be allowed to
implement these practices on their own. Embedded within the framework of this plan are the