Sustainability 2019,11, 3141 3 of 15
the information meets their expectations during the decision-making process and is provided in an
adequate manner [26].
Information quality represents the most basic communication capacity between an online buyer
and seller and is regarded as the foundational factor in building trust [
15
]. A review of the literature
on technology acceptance shows that trust in information is a key predictive factor for behavioral
intention [
12
,
27
–
29
]. User decisions made while using systems is determined by security and
trust [30,31].
Depending on use and purpose, information quality may be assessed through understandability,
reliability, timeliness, and usefulness. Seddon [
32
] proposed relevance, timeliness, and accuracy as
evaluation items for information quality while Delone and McLean [
14
] argued that individualization,
completeness, relevance, ease of understanding, and security determine success in e-commerce. Nelson,
Todd, and Wixom [
33
] expanded on the factors presented by Delone and McLean [
14
] with sub-factors
such as accuracy, completeness, currency, and format. Hsieh, Kuo, Yang, and Lin [
34
] stated that
the key information quality factors of blogs were understandability, reliability, scope, and usefulness.
As is evident from these studies, various categories of information quality have been presented but
a standardized set of attributes has yet to be established [
21
]. Several studies have also conducted
single-dimension examinations using these factors [22,35–37].
Numerous studies have established the relationship between information quality and performance
expectancy (perceived usefulness), effort expectancy (perceived ease of use), and behavioral intention.
Rai, Lang, and Welker [
38
] and Kulkarni, Ravindran, and Freeze [
39
] found that information quality
had significant influence on perceived usefulness. Based on the TAM model, Shih [
17
] found that
perceived information quality in Internet shopping had a positive effect on perceived ease of use and
usefulness. Lin, Fofanah, and Liang [
35
] found that information quality had a strong influence on
the perceived usefulness and ease of use of e-government systems. Using UTAUT, Alshehri, Drew,
Alhussain, and Alghamdi [
36
] found that the website quality of e-government systems had a stronger
influence on the intention to use than performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence,
and facilitating conditions. Escobar-Rodriguez and Carvajal-Trujillo [
40
] found that the quality of
information positively influenced intention to use by reinforcing consumers’ trust in e-commerce. Kang
and Namkung [
21
] stated that, when purchasing food products, the quality of information provided
by O2O commerce positively influenced perceived usefulness and ease of use. Zhao [
22
] found that
the information quality provided by social network-based communities played a significant role in the
intention to participate in communities.
Based on the relevant literature, this study specified the information quality of delivery app
services as the determinant of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and behavioral intention to
analyze how these variables are related.
H1: The information quality of delivery apps will significantly influence performance expectancy.
H2: The information quality of delivery apps will significantly influence effort expectancy.
H3: The information quality of delivery apps will significantly influence continuous intention.
2.2. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2)
The TAM model, based on the theory of reasoned action (TRA) in the field of social psychology, has
been employed in numerous studies to explain the acceptance of technology [
41
]. In particular, it has
been applied to analyze information systems in mobile commerce [
42
], e-commerce [
43
], and social
networks [
44
]. However, the model’s analysis of relationships between variables in IT environments
is limited because it is unable to adequately account for the influences between various exogenous
variables and the TAM variables [
45
]. Furthermore, it has been criticized for its inability to provide a
general explanation of work-technology environments [46].