The challenge to financial economists as well as corporations has been to develop a
payout policy framework where firms maximize shareholders’ wealth and investors maximize
utility. In such a framework payout policy would function in a way that is consistent with these
observations and is not rejected by empirical data.
According to dividend irrelevance theory, firm value and shareholder wealth are not related to
the decision of whether a dividend should be paid. This theory was presented by Franco
Modigliani and Merton Miller in 1961. Prior to their theory, most economists believed that the
more dividends a firm paid, the more valuable the firm would look to investors. This theory is
running behind the idea that investors do not care about dividends and capital gains, they believe
earnings. The irrelevance theory indicates that paying out dividends does not increase the
profitability or stock price of a company. (Michaely, 2003) Which accounts for a company’s
investment policy and the prospects is the only thing that is thought when evaluating a company.
This view was drawn from an broadening of the discounted dividends approach to firm
valuation, which says that the value V of the firm at date 0, if the first dividends are paid one
period from now at date 1, is given by the formula: where Dt = the dividends paid by the firm at
the end of period t, and rt = the investors opportunity cost of capital for period t. (Michaely ,
2003)
Types of Dividends
There are 3 types of dividend firms’ payout to their shareholders, a regular dividend, a
stable dividend, irregular dividend, or no dividend. Under the regular dividend a company pay
out dividends every year. Firms with this policy has steady cash flow and earnings. Firms that