Molla Salmanfarsi
Professor Robert Gmelin
English 302
25 October 2016
Comparison of MLK’s Works
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. lived as one of the greatest social and religious leaders in a country
where a group of its citizens had to endure excruciating conditions of disenfranchisement, inferiority, and
degradation to a second class citizenship by reasons of race, color, or origin. King wrote several letters and
gave inspirational speeches during his lifetime and strived to persuade governmental leaders in an effort to
condemn all acts of racial discrimination. Specifically, two of King’s works, the “Letter from Birmingham
Jail” and the “I Have a Dream Speech” lays an acute understanding of the power of rhetoric and a keen
awareness of audience. What makes these documents so powerful is the manner in which he shifts his tone
and rhetoric many times throughout each text in order to address a specific audience. Since many of Martin
Luther King‘s arguments are based on emotion and a challenge to tradition and culture, it is most useful to
look at the ways he uses modes of persuasion to certain subsets of his audience while making arguments
that challenged conceptions of these traditions that America is based on.
In King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” addressed to the Clergymen from Birmingham Prison, he
uses the rhetorical appeal of ethos, pathos, and logos throughout the letter and language that invokes a sense
to the clergymen‘s hypocrisy. Once he accomplishes this, the argument for the protests broadens out as his
tone shifts and begins to include the larger agreeing audience directly. Richard P. Fulkerson, an Associate
Professor of English and Coordinator of Composition in East Texas State University explains more clearly
in one of his quarterly journal speeches that King‘s “letter was designed apparently as a refutative response