Feed My Starving Children and The Good Grocer present two very different methods of
alleviating the same problem: food insecurity. They are both inspired by the teachings of Jesus to
feed the hungry and serve thy neighbor. However, this is where the similarities between the
organizations end. The volunteer experience, scale, operations, and messaging are drastically
different. Because of this, the impact made by each organization looks unlike the other and carry
potential risks unique to each.
Volunteer Experience
The volunteer experience at FMSC is structured to run like a well-oiled machine. The
meal-packing process is reminiscent of the scientific management theories applied to the Ford
Motor Company in the early 20th century. Every step of the process is laid out to minimize error,
boost efficiency, and ensure that the maximum number of meals are packed over the two-hour
period. After assuming one of the small, repetitive tasks, one starts to feel like a small cog in a
very large system. To alleviate this and keep volunteers motivated, FMSC does two things. They
pump fun, upbeat music throughout the facility and encourage volunteers to get competitive
against each other, creating a game-like feeling. Due to the unavoidable distance and anonymity
between the volunteer and the child on the receiving end of the MannaPack, the shift is wrapped
up with an anecdote from one of the MannaPack recipients, as well as a celebration of the
volunteers’ productivity.
In contrast to this, The Good Grocer volunteers may experience something different at
every shift. The experience is dependent upon what gifts the volunteer already possesses. The
volunteer shift is focused on matching volunteer skills to organizational need. Therefore, if you
have experience working in media, they may ask you to contribute to their website. If you are