2.1 Introduction
In many corporations, especially giant corporations, compensation of high level
executives, such as the Chief Executive Officer (CEOs), Chief Financial Officer (CFOs), and
Chief Operating Officer (COOs), are based on the performance of their corporations,
respectively. In a good based economy, corporations are aggressive for high level performances
from their high executives since corporations pay levels and based performances bonuses are
tremendously astronomical. Lately, there has been plenty of debate over CEO compensation as
well as their benefit policies. For example, just recently The Walt Disney Company CEO Bob
Iger has been under fire because of his yearly compensation and on top of his compensation not
being enough he asked for another raise. However, what is making Mr. Iger look bad is he is not
willing to approve higher wages for company employees in Southern California. This paper will
examine CEOs compensations and benefits, CEOs and stakeholders of the company, potential
strength and weakness as well as assumption and biases.
2.2 Historical Background
A trend that continues to move in favor of CEOs compensation is compensation
continues to rise throughout the years. A report done by Alyssa Davis and Lawrence Mishel from
the Economic Policy Institute states, “CEO-to-worker compensation ratio was 20-to-1 in 1965
and 29.9-to-1 in 1978, grew to 122.6-to-1 in 1995, peaked at 383.4-to-1 in 2000, and was 295.9-
to-1 in 2013, far higher than it was in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, or 1990s” (Davis & Mishel,
2014). The ratio given to us from the first time a CEO-to-worker compensation ratio was
recorded in 1965 was still high for a ratio in the 60s. However, if you see the ratios throughout
the years, the numbers keep rising in favor of CEO compensation and it does not seem it will go
away anytime soon especially if you have the top CEOs of giant corporations having a positive
impact within their corporations.