Running head: TEAM D CASE STUDY ASSIGMENTS 1
Case 1-3 Politicization of Accounting Standards:
The creation and formation of these committees and boards were due to the
demanding needs for consistency in an economy, which is regulated within a capitalistic market.
Since business organizations evolved from a simplistic structure to corporations that involve
many ways of investing business capital, there was an immediate need for a mandate to govern
on how to report financial statements. In addition, the formations of these entities were to
establish standards and not “politicalized” the accounting field. Another reason that these
standards were established was “to safeguard shareholders against improper actions by corporate
officers” (Schroeder, Clark, & Cathey, 2011).
By creating and establishing standards initialized by this these boards and committees,
the accounting profession became organized and institutionalized. Training for this field was no
longer just accomplished through apprenticeship but through education on colleges and
universities. By educating the accountants during that period, it also developed a structure on
how to identify corporate abuses and how this could be resolved. Accounting principles and
practices became major subject matters on the formulation of CAP, APB, and FASB. One of the
results on these efforts was the establishment of SEC to administer and authorize financial
accounting practices and reporting standards.
However, a disadvantage that is evident is the implementation of numerous accounting
standards. The standards imposed will not apply as a whole on small businesses’ financial
reporting requirements and could not provide a benefit to an organization. There have been many
criticisms on this aspect of standards overload and was only addressed” in 2009 by IASB by