Running Head: CASE STUDY 1
Case Study
1. Critical Legal Thinking
The doctrine of implied-in-fact contract is basically a contract where an agreement
between the entities involved has been inferred from their conduct. This doctrine provides that
three elements have to be established which include: (i) the plaintiff offered services/property to
the defendant gratuitously; (ii) plaintiff expects payment for those services/property provided;
and (iii) the defendant had an opportunity to decline but did not do so. Both Taco Bell and
