Questions Chapter 7 (Continued)
The net method is desirable from a theoretical standpoint because it values the
receivable at its net realizable value. In addition, recording the sales at net provides
a better assessment of the revenue that was earned from the sale of the product. If
the purchasing company fails to take the discount, then the company should reflect
this amount as income. The gross method for receivables and sales is used in
practice normally because it is expedient and its use does not generally have any
significant effect on the presentation of the financial statements.
7. The basic problems that relate to the valuation of receivables are (1) the
determination of the face value of the receivable, (2) the probability of future
collection of the receivable, and (3) the length of time the receivable will be
outstanding. The determination of the face value of the receivable is a function of
the trade discount, cash discount, and certain allowance accounts such as the
Allowance for Sales Returns and Allowances.
8. The theoretical superiority of the allowance method over the direct write-off method
of accounting for bad debts is two-fold. First, since revenue is considered to be
recognized at the point of sale on the assumption that the resulting receivables are
valid liquid assets merely awaiting collection, periodic income will be overstated to
the extent of any receivables that eventually become uncollectible. The proper
matching of revenue and expense requires that gross sales in the income statement
be partially offset by a charge to bad debt expense that is based on an estimate of
the receivables arising from gross sales that will not be converted into cash.
Second, accounts receivable on the balance sheet should be stated at their
estimated net realizable value. The allowance method accomplishes this by
deducting from gross receivables the allowance for doubtful accounts. The latter is
derived from the charges for bad debt expense on the income statement.
9. The percentage-of-sales method. Under this method Bad Debt Expense is
debited and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts is credited with a percentage of the
current year’s credit or total sales. The rate is determined by reference to the
relationship between prior years’ credit or total sales and actual bad debts arising
therefrom. Consideration should also be given to changes in credit policy and
current economic conditions. Although the rate should theoretically be based on and
applied to credit sales, the use of total sales is acceptable if the ratio of credit sales
to total sales does not vary significantly from year to year.
The percentage-of-sales method of providing for estimated uncollectible receivables
is intended to charge bad debt expense to the period in which the corresponding
sales are recorded and is, therefore, designed for the preparation of a fair income
statement. Due to annually insignificant but cumulatively significant errors in the
experience rate which may result in either an excessive or inadequate balance in
the allowance account, however, this method may not accurately report accounts
receivable in the balance sheet at their estimated net realizable value. This can be
prevented by periodically reviewing and, if necessary, adjusting the balance in the
allowance account. The materiality of any such adjustment would govern its
treatment for reporting purposes.
The necessity of such adjustments of the allowance account indicates that bad debt
expenses have not been accurately matched against related sales. Further, even
when the experience rate does not result in an excessive or inadequate balance in