Banking and Currency Crisis
1
BANKING AND CURRENCY CRISIS
VIDYALANKAR INSTITUTE OF TECHONOLOGY
By Shivani Solanki
Batch A
Roll no. 17106A1064
Banking and Currency Crisis
2
Abstract
Study the stylized facts of the banking crisis and the currency crisis. Banking uncertainty
was most frequent in the developed economies. Identify a set of characteristics of economic,
financial and structural conditions preceding the beginning of banking and currency crisis
in 40 advanced economies over period 1970-2010. Also the use of Classification and
Regression Tree Methodology (CART) and Random Forest (RF) extension, allows the
detection of key variables driving binary crisis outcomes, determines critical tipping points
and allows for interaction among key variables. Distinguish between country structural
characteristics, basic country conditions and international developments. It has been found
that crisis is more varied than they are similar. For banking crisis, I find that in long term it
is high house price inflation while in short term low interest rate spreads in the banking
sector and a shallow yield curve are most important forerunners. For currency crisis, in
short term high domestic rates with overvalued exchange rates are the most powerful
predictors. I find that both international developments and country structural
characteristics are relevant banking crisis predictors. Currency crisis, seem to be more
driven by country idiosyncratic and short term developments. I find that some variables
such as provide important unconditional signals, but it’s difficult to use them as conditional
signals, domestic credit gap and more impotently, to find relevant threshold values.
Keywords: Banking crisis, binary classification tree, currency crisis, early warning indicators
Banking and Currency Crisis
3
Section I: INTRODUCTION
Away from the empirical debate on the direction of causality in the relationship between
finance and growth, it is widely acknowledged that good performance of the financial system
is favorable for economic development. Although the literature on crisis and early warning is
extensive, the research on the occurrence and early warning indicators of economic crisis in
developed countries is still relatively thin. However, recent experience has demonstrated the
relevance of the topic for developed economies. This paper tries to establish which stylized
facts on crisis occurrence and which early warning indicators are relevant for developed
countries by employing an advanced technique to overcome model uncertainty and by
utilizing a new quarterly data set. Traditionally, the literature on crisis has been focused on
emerging markets. More recently, large samples of countries, including both developing and
developed economies, have been explored. While currency crisis were the subject of
investigation in the pioneering studies, the recent literature has tried to encompass more
types of costly events, including various types of banking and debt crisis (Leaven and
Valencia, 2012; Levy-Yeyati and Panizza, 2011; Reinhart and Rogoff, 2011). The literature has
suggested that all types of crisis can be very costly and that there are possible causal
relationships between various types of crisis (Kaminsky and Reinhart, 1999; Reinhart and
Rogoff, 2011). While output losses are induced by disruptions of the credit supply in the case
of banking crisis, the massive devaluations inherent to currency crisis are detrimental to
trade flows. Debt crisis in turn mostly increase the cost of sovereign borrowing and are
usually followed by austerity measures that have an adverse impact on domestic demand.
The literature has also proposed various early warning indicators, such as depletion of
international reserves, real exchange rate misalignment or excessive domestic credit growth
for currency crisis in emerging markets, rapid growth in domestic credit and monetary
aggregates for both banking and currency crisis, a sharp increase in private indebtedness for
Banking and Currency Crisis
banking crisis, growth in global credit for costly asset price bubbles, a large real GDP decline
for debt crisis.
To address these issues we use Classification and Regression Tree (CART) methodology and
its generalization, Random Forest (RF) analysis, to model explicitly the non-linear
interactions between variables and deal with missing values and outliers, which are usually a
problem for regression-based frameworks. The CART and RF frameworks provide crisis
thresholds for key variables, thus significantly simplifying the interpretation of the results for
decision-makers and non-technical audiences.
This framework has both advantages and disadvantages compared with other common early
warning methods. On the one hand, it allows explicitly for the fact that not all crisis are alike
and accommodates non-linearity by including conditional thresholds. On the other hand, it