AUDITING THEORY
AT.508-Audit Planning-An Overview
LECTURE NOTES
Audit Planning
The auditor plans the audit so that it will be performed in an effective
manner, i.e., to gain reasonable assurance that the FSs are free from material
misstatement.
Audit planning involves:
establishing the overall audit strategy (a general strategy) for the
engagement; and
developing an audit plan (a detailed approach for the expected nature,
timing and extent of the audit),
in order to reduce audit risk (i.e., the chance that audit opinion is
inappropriate) to an acceptably low level.
Main outputs of audit planning:
The overall audit strategy or audit planning memorandum
The audit plan or audit programs or audit completion checklists
Benefits of Audit Planning
Appropriate attention to important areas of the audit.
Identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis.
Organize and manage the audit engagement so that it is performed in an
effective and efficient manner.
Assist in the proper selection of engagement team members and the
assignment of work to them.
Facilitate the direction and supervision of engagement team members and
the review of their work.
Assist, where applicable, in coordination of work done by auditors of
components and experts.
Audit Planning and Risks Assessment Activities
Planning is not a discrete phase of an audit, but rather a continual and
iterative process. Planning, however, includes consideration of the timing of
certain activities and audit procedures that need to be completed prior to the
performance of further audit procedures (i.e., tests of controls and
substantive procedures).
Page 2 of 24 AUD.508
The following are the planning activities or procedures:
Determining of materiality;
Performing risks audit procedures (RAP), including analytical procedures, to
understand the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal
control;
Identifying material classes of transactions, account balances and
disclosures;
Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatements of the
financial statements; and
Finally, preparing the outputs of audit planning overall audit strategy and
audit plan containing the auditor’s responses to the identified risks.
The nature and extent of the above planning activities will vary according to:
the size and complexity of the entity;
the key engagement team members’ previous experience with the entity;
and
the changes in circumstances that occur during the audit engagement.
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Members
The engagement partner and other key members of the engagement team
shall be involved in planning the audit, including planning and participating in
the discussion among engagement team members, to draw on their
experience and insight, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of
the planning process.
Results of Preliminary Engagement Activities
Please refer to the previous topic “AT.503 for the list of preliminary
engagement activities.
The results of preliminary engagement activities:
assist the auditor in identifying and evaluating events or circumstances that
may adversely affect the auditor’s ability to plan and perform the audit
engagement.
enables the auditor to plan an audit engagement for which, for example:
o The auditor maintains the necessary independence and ability to perform
the engagement.
o There are no issues with management integrity that may affect the
auditor’s willingness to continue the engagement.
o There is no misunderstanding with the client as to the terms of the
engagement.
In an initial audit, the auditor may need to expand the planning activities
because the auditor does not ordinarily have the previous experience with the
entity than when planning recurring engagements. For an initial audit
engagement, additional matters the auditor may consider in establishing the
overall audit strategy and audit plan include the following:
Page 3 of 24 AUD.508
Arrangements to review the predecessor auditor’s working papers.
Any major issues (including the application of accounting principles or of
auditing and reporting standards).
The audit procedures necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding opening balances.
Other procedures required by the firm’s system of quality control for initial
audit engagements.
Overall Audit Strategy
Overall audit strategy (formerly known as “Audit Planning Memorandum”)
sets the scope, timing, and direction of the audit, and guides the development
of the audit plan.
In establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor is required to:
a. Identify the characteristics of the engagement that define its scope
b. Ascertain the reporting objectives of the engagement to plan the timing of
the audit and the nature of the communications required
c. Consider the factors that, in our professional judgment, are significant in
directing the engagement team’s efforts
d. Consider the results of preliminary engagement activities and, where
applicable, whether knowledge gained on other engagements performed by
the engagement partner for the entity is relevant
e. Ascertain the nature, timing and extent of resources necessary to perform
the engagement.
Characteristics that define the Scope of Engagement
The applicable FRF
Industry-specific reporting requirements
The expected audit coverage
The work of internal auditors
The entity’s use of service organizations
The effect of information technology
The availability of client personnel and data.
Reporting Objectives, Timing of the Audit, and Nature of Communications
The entity’s timetable for reporting
Meetings with management and TCWG to discuss the nature, timing and
extent of the audit work.
The discussion with management and TCWG regarding the expected type
and timing of reports to be issued and other communications, both written
and oral, including the auditor’s report, management letters and
communications to TCWG; and regarding the expected communications on
the status of audit work throughout the engagement.
Communication with auditors of components.
Communications among engagement team members, including the nature
and timing of team meetings and timing of the review of work performed.
Any other expected communications with third parties, including any
statutory or contractual reporting responsibilities arising from the audit.
Page 4 of 24 AUD.508
Significant Factors, Preliminary Engagement Activities, and Knowledge Gained
on Other Engagements
The determination of materiality and identification of material classes of
transactions, account balances and disclosures
Preliminary identification of risk areas
The impact of the assessed ROMM at the FSs level
Exercise of professional skepticism
Internal control of the entity
Significant business developments and the industry
Legal and regulatory development and framework
Nature, Timing and Extent of Necessary Resources
The selection of the engagement team (including, where necessary, the
engagement quality control reviewer) and the assignment of audit.
Engagement budgeting and timetable.
The auditor shall document the overall audit strategy commonly in the form of
a memorandum.
Audit Plan
Audit plan (a.k.a., “audit program or audit completion checklist) is more
detailed than the overall audit strategy in that it includes the nature, timing
and extent of audit procedures to be performed by engagement team
members required to implement the overall audit strategy into a
comprehensive description of the work to be performed.
The auditor shall develop an audit plan that shall include a description of:
a. The nature, timing, and extent of planned risk assessment procedures
(RAP)
b. The nature, timing, and extent of planned further audit procedures (FAP),
which include tests of controls and substantive procedures, at the assertion
level
c. Other planned audit procedures that are required to be carried out
The auditor shall document audit plan recording the planned nature, timing
and extent of risk assessment procedures and further audit procedures (tests
of controls and substantive procedures) at the assertion level in response to
the assessed risks. The auditor may use standard (pre-printed) audit
programs, tailored as needed.
Audit program is a list of procedures used to gather sufficient appropriate
audit evidence. It serves as a set of instructions to staff involved in the audit
and as a means to control and record the proper execution of the work.
Traditionally, the two types of audit programs only pertain to further audit
procedures (RAP), i.e., for test of controls and substantive procedures, are:
Page 5 of 24 AUD.508
a. Compliance test audit programs this is prepared when performing tests of
controls, i.e., when the auditor plans to rely on internal control that was
deemed to be preliminarily effective.
b. Substantive test audit program this is prepared when the auditor will
perform substantive procedures for each material class of transactions,
account balance, and disclosure.
Thus, the timing of preparing audit programs depend on the following
circumstances:
Initial audit prepared until the completion of review and documentation of
the entity’s internal control.
Continuing audit can be prepared in advance of testing, since the auditor
has prior knowledge of the entity’s internal control and previous risks
assessment.
Audit program (audit plan) for risks assessment procedures is normally
prepared in a separate documentation.
Changes to Planning Decisions during the Course of the Audit
The auditor shall update and change the overall audit strategy and the audit
plan as necessary during the course of the audit.
The establishment of the overall audit strategy and the detailed audit plan are
not necessarily discrete or sequential processes, but are closely inter-related
since changes in one may result in consequential changes to the other.
Other Planning Considerations
Other planning considerations made by the auditor include the following:
Seeking assistance from the entity
Considering the work perform by others
Ensuring direction, supervision and review throughout the audit.
Entity Assistance to the Auditor
The auditor may decide to discuss elements of planning with the entity’s
management to facilitate the conduct and management of the audit
engagement (for example, to coordinate some of the planned audit
procedures with the work of the entity’s personnel), but not so detailed to
compromise the effectiveness of the audit or making the audit procedures too
predictable.
Consideration of the Work Performed by Others
Considering work of others in an audit involved the following:
Relevance of the work of internal auditors
Need for the work of experts (specialist)
Work of component auditors in a group financial statements audit
Page 6 of 24 AUD.508
Work of Internal Auditors
Internal auditing is an appraisal activity established within an entity as a
service to the entity. The work of internal auditors assists the external auditor
in planning and performing an effective audit.
Considering the work of internal auditors involve the following two phases:
Preliminary assessment of client’s internal auditing function
Evaluation and testing the work of internal auditing function
Preliminary assessment of internal auditing function includes determining
whether or not internal audit function appears relevant to specific areas of
financial statements audit. When the internal audit function appears relevant,
external auditors shall consider the internal auditor’s:
Competence professional qualifications and experience
Objectivity (organizational status) line of reporting results of internal
audit normally directly to BOD’s audit committee
Due professional care planning, supervision and documentation of work
Scope of function nature and extent of work
The table below summarizes the external auditor’s responses depending in
the result of assessment:
Result
Response
Rely on the work of internal auditor
Evaluate and test the internal
auditor’s work to confirm its
adequacy for external audit
Not relying on the work of internal
auditor
Need not evaluate and test the
internal auditor’s work
The external auditor may request assistance from internal auditors in
performing routine or mechanical audit procedures provided the external
auditor supervises and reviews internal auditors work
The use of internal auditor’s work does not change the external auditor’s
responsibility for audit opinion; thus, no reference is made in audit report
Work of Experts (Specialist)
Expert or specialist refers to a person or firm possessing special skill,
knowledge and experience in a particular field other than accounting and
auditing.
An expert may be
Engaged by the entity;
Engaged by the auditor;
Employed by the entity; or
Employed by the auditor.
The auditor considers the following when using the work (assistance) of an
expert:
Materiality of an item being considered
Risk of misstatement (nature and complexity)
Quality and quantity of other audit evidence available

When using the work of an expert, the auditor should assess and evaluate the
expert’s
Professional competence Professional qualification, experience and
reputation
Objectivity expert’s relationship to the entity
Scope of work objective and source of data (inputs), methods, models
and assumptions used by the expert
After the above assessment and evaluation of the expert, the external auditor
shall test whether or not the result of work of expert is consistent with
auditor’s knowledge. The external auditor may rely on the work of the expert
if deemed consistent. Otherwise, the inconsistency must be resolved first
before reliance can be made.
Work of Component Auditors
Key definitions
Group financial statements Financial statements that include the financial