I believe Apple has performed very well in the industry. Being involved in the high
technology industry there is a constant need for companies to strive towards innovation.
These companies are forced to either innovate, or become stale and eventually fail. This is
apparent throughout the whole article. The company was formed in a garage in 1976
through building circuit boards. Eventually the company was named Apple Computer, and
in 1978 began selling the Apple II computer. According to Yoffie (2012) “Apple quickly
became the industry leader, selling more than 100,000 Apple IIs by the end of 1980. In
December 1980, Apple launched a successful IPO” (p. 2). In 1981 IBM entered the market
which had a negative impact on Apple’s performance. Apple was not prepared for this
since IBM was teamed up with Intel, so they could appeal to consumers by offering a
faster computer that had the ability to be cloned (open system). Apple on the other hand
did not have an open system. They preferred to design everything themselves, and refused
to allow third parties to use their hardware.
It is apparent now that a lot of people prefer to customize electronic products. It was the
same case in the late 1990’s. The ability of an open system offered by IBM allowed
computer enthusiast to buy every part of a computer and build their own system. Plus all
the IBM compatible parts on the market due to third parties, allowed customers to build
computers for business, media, and gaming. Through Apple focusing on their exclusivity
they have achieved power and control. However, at the same time they have created an
opportunity for a parallel market. The failure of allowing third parties to use hardware and
software, the design, and processor speed eventually led to a 62% decrease in net income
from 1981 through 1984. At the same time IBM was able to flourish and gain market share
becoming the standard of the industry. Shortly after Jobs was replaced, Sculley began to
focus on desktop publishing and education. The software, peripherals, hardware, and
IMB-compatibles enabled Apple to become successful again by gaining back market share
they had lost. They also developed a loyal customer base, according to Yoffie (2012) “The
majority of IBM and compatible users ‘put up’ with their machines, but Apple’s customers
‘love’ their Macs” (p. 2). This was not to last, Apple was able to charge high premium
prices for their products, but as the prices for IBM-compatibles steadily fell so did their
market share. Sculley tried to regain market share by teaming up with Intel, and IBM.
However, Sculley would soon be replaced by Spindler and Amelio after Apple’s gross
margin fell 14 points lower than the 10 year average. Spindler focused on cutting staff,
killing the Intel partnership, allowing only a handful of clone companies, and
concentrating on a new operating system. After the venture with IBM ended and Apple
experienced almost a $70 million first quarter loss; Sculley was replaced by Amelio.