Doctrine (of 1823), so he failed, more understandable, to foresee that the American democracy
would…give a loftier and more farsighted lead in the development of the international
community” (Wright 56). Whereas in today’s day, it can be argued the America’s role in
international community is one of the biggest factors of American exceptionalism. Even though
de Tocqueville was able see so many exceptional characteristic, Wright was able to point out that
he failed to predict others.
The original concept of American exceptionalism shed light to the rest of the world who
were blind of the America’s exceptionality at an early point in the country’s life. It was extremely
rare of Europeans, let alone de Tocqueville, to see greatness in such a new and different country.
Although de Tocqueville focused on the greatness of the country, I believe it is more important
that de Tocqueville recognized the imperfection in America. If the original concept of de
Tocqueville’s includes the imperfection of America, is it fair to criticize political leaders for
questioning how exceptional America still is?
In the article “Make no exception, save one: American exceptionalism, the American
presidency, and the age of Obama”, Jason Gilmore, Penelope Sheets, and Charles Rowling
analyze how presidents invoke American exceptionalism into their political speeches. They also
collected data regarding President Obama and his use of American exceptionalism in his
speeches. Three general sections were analyzed: how presidents have invoked American
exceptionalism in the past, how a national crisis affects how presidents invoke American
exceptionalism into their speeches, and finally show data they collected on how often American
exceptionalism is invoked as well as the percentage of speeches that use American
exceptionalism in dialogue. Gilmore et.al. take these two pieces of data and compare President