Section B
1 (a) Importance of audit planning
– It helps the auditor to devote appropriate attention to important areas of the audit.
– It helps the auditor to identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis.
– It helps the auditor to properly organise and manage the audit engagement so that it is performed in an effective and
efficient manner.
– It assists in the selection of engagement team members with appropriate levels of capabilities and competence to
respond to anticipated risks and the proper assignment of work to them.
– It facilitates the direction and supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work.
– It assists, where applicable, in the coordination of work done by experts.
(b) Procedures due to increased risk of fraud
The audit senior should consider undertaking the following procedures as a result of the increased risk of the payroll fraud.
– Discuss with management and those charged with governance as to whether they are aware of any other payroll frauds
or potential frauds.
– Review board minutes for evidence of management discussion of the materiality of the payroll fraud and to the existence
of any additional frauds or suspected frauds.
– Discuss with the payroll manager the nature of the payroll fraud, how it occurred and the financial impact of amounts
incorrectly paid into the payroll clerk’s bank account.
– Review the supporting documentation to confirm the total of the fraudulent payments made and assess the materiality
of this misstatement.
– Review and test the internal controls surrounding setting up of and payments to new joiners to assess whether further
frauds may have occurred.
– Consider whether other information obtained by the audit team indicates risks of additional material misstatements with
regards to payroll fraud.
– Obtain a written representation from management acknowledging that they have disclosed to the auditors all knowledge
of actual and suspected payroll frauds.
2Audit risks and responses
12
Audit risk Auditors response
Eagle Heating Co (Eagle) has decreased the selling price of
products significantly since September 2014 and there are
increased levels of inventory expected at the year end.
It is possible that the selling price may have fallen so that the
net realisable value (NRV) of inventory is below cost.
IAS 2 Inventory requires inventory to be stated at the lower of
cost and NRV. Hence it is possible that inventory is overvalued.
The auditor should undertake detailed cost and NRV testing to
assess whether inventory is overvalued and requires write
down.
A key customer of Eagle has been experiencing financial
difficulties and Eagle has agreed a six-month payment break;
however, the finance director does not believe an allowance is
required.
If the customer is experiencing difficulties, there is an increased
risk that the receivable is not recoverable and hence is
overvalued.
If the six-months payment break has now ended, review after
date cash receipts for this customer to assess whether any
payments have been made.
Discuss with the finance director why he feels an allowance is
not required. Review whether any general allowance for
uncollectable accounts is sufficient to cover the amount of this
receivable.
In light of the increased competition, reduction in selling price
and financial difficulties of a key customer, there is an
increased risk that Eagle is facing going concern difficulties.
The auditor should undertake detailed going concern testing.
They should review the cash flow forecast for the foreseeable
future to assess whether the going concern basis is appropriate
or whether additional going concern disclosures are required in
the financial statements.
The financial controller of Eagle was dismissed in October and
is threatening to sue the company for unfair dismissal.
If it is probable that Eagle will make payment to the financial
controller, a provision for unfair dismissal is required. If the
payment is possible rather than probable, a contingent liability
disclosure would be necessary. If Eagle has not done this, there
is a risk over the completeness of any provisions or contingent
liabilities.
The audit team should write to the company’s lawyers to
enquire of the existence and likelihood of success of any claim
from the former financial controller.